California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Grant, 20 Cal.4th 150, 83 Cal.Rptr.2d 295, 973 P.2d 72 (Cal. 1999):
As the United States Supreme Court has recognized, "deciding when a statute operates 'retroactively' is not always a simple or mechanical task" (Landgraf v. USI Film Products(1994) 511 U.S. 244, 268, 114 S.Ct. 1483, 128 L.Ed.2d 229) and "comes at the end of a process of judgment concerning the nature and extent of the change in the law and the degree of connection between the operation of the new rule and a relevant past event" (id. at p. 270, 114 S.Ct. 1483). In exercising this judgment, "familiar considerations of fair notice, reasonable reliance, and settled expectations offer sound guidance." (Ibid.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.