What is the test for determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Lam Thanh Nguyen, 191 Cal.Rptr.3d 182, 354 P.3d 90, 61 Cal.4th 1015 (Cal. 2015):

Appellate inquiry into the sufficiency of the evidence does not require a court to ask itself whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citation.] Instead, the relevant question is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. (Jackson v. Virginia (1979) 443 U.S. 307, 318319, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560.) In other words, it is the

[61 Cal.4th 1056]

Other Questions


In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of the evidence in a sexual assault case, what is the test for determining sufficiency? (California, United States of America)
When testifying in a sexual assault case, does the use of the word "sex" by the victims constitute sufficient evidence for the purposes of sexual arousal or sexual gratification? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining sufficient evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining sufficient evidence to support the findings of a jury in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the sufficiency of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.