What is the test for determining the sufficiency of evidence in a murder case?

"In assessing the sufficiency of the evidence, we review the entire record in the light most favorable to the judgment to determine whether it discloses evidence that is reasonable, credible, and of solid value such that a reasonable trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. [Citations.] Reversal on this ground is unwarranted unless it appears 'that upon no hypothesis whatever is there sufficient substantial evidence to support [the conviction].' [Citation.]" (People v. Bolin (1998) 18 Cal.4th 297, 331.)

Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought. ( 187, subd. (a).) Malice is implied when the circumstances of the killing show it was done with an "abandoned and malignant heart." ( 188.) Implied malice requires that the defendant act with a wanton disregard of the high probability of death. (People v. Pensinger (1991) 52 Cal.3d 1210, 1246.) The facts must demonstrate the defendant had a subjective awareness of the risk. (People v. Watson (1981) 30 Cal.3d 290, 298

Page 15