The following excerpt is from Mejia-Paiz v. I.N.S., 111 F.3d 720 (9th Cir. 1996):
Under special circumstances, the First Amendment seems to tolerate an inquiry into the sincerity or authenticity of an individual's professed religious beliefs. See U.S. v. Ballard, 322 U.S. 78, 64 S.Ct. 882, 88 L.Ed. 1148 (1944) (inquiry into the petitioners' belief in the facts they asserted as religious truths was appropriate in a trial for mail fraud); Witmer v. U.S., 348 U.S. 375, 381, 75 S.Ct. 392, 395-396, 99 L.Ed. 428 (1955) (sincerity of a registrant in objecting, on religious grounds, to participation in war was necessary factor in determining conscientious objector status). 1 Although these cases superficially appear to authorize government scrutiny of the strength of religious convictions, the cases themselves do not make such an inquiry.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.