What is the test for determining the relevance of a prosecutor's evidence in a sexual assault case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ervin, B227021 (Cal. App. 2011):
her identification of appellant as the perpetrator. The trial court had broad discretion to determine the relevance of the prosecutor's evidence. (People v. Harris (2005) 37 Cal.4th 310, 337.) We discern no abuse.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In determining the sufficiency of evidence in a civil case, how have courts considered the evidence in the context of sexual assault cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence of prior sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining relevancy and admissibility of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test of relevance for admitting or excluding relevant evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining relevancy and admissibility of evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant evidence that the prosecutor and defense counsel may have to present to the jury at the penalty phase of a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
