What is the test for determining the admissibility of testimony based on a newly developed scientific experiment or principle?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Law, 114 Cal.Rptr. 708, 40 Cal.App.3d 69 (Cal. App. 1974):

The test for determining the admissibility of testimony based on a newly developed scientific experiment or principle was stated in Huntingdon v. Crowley (1966) 64 Cal.2d 647, 653--654, 51 Cal.Rptr. 254, 260, 414 P.2d 382, 388:

Other Questions


What is the test for admissibility of expert testimony based upon the application of a new scientific technique? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a medical malpractice case has been successful when the medical director made a determination based on the extrinsic evidence? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness's testimony from an earlier proceeding admissible under the prior testimony exception to the hearsay rule? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will transcripts of testimony be admissible in lieu of personal testimony? (California, United States of America)
Does section 669 of the California Criminal Code apply to determine whether a determinate or determinate sentence should run concurrently with an indeterminate sentence? (California, United States of America)
Does a juvenile court hearing determine whether a minor should be tried as an adult prior to a determination that the minor's guilt should be determined? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury at a sexual assault trial determine the burden of proof based on the testimony of the complaining witness alone? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant have any authority for the proposition that the exclusion of testimony based upon the incompetence of the witness or the absence of foundation for the testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a defendant has a right to a jury determination based upon proof beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Whether a court's ruling is based on oral testimony or written declarations, when conflicting inferences can reasonably be drawn from the facts, can the appellate court defer to the trial court's factual determinations? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.