The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Nolasco, 926 F.2d 869 (9th Cir. 1991):
We recognized the difficulty of defining reasonable doubt in United States v. Witt, 648 F.2d 608 (9th Cir.1981), where we held that a district court's refusal to define reasonable doubt was not reversible error. We stated that "[a]lthough a proper definition is always appropriate, the decision whether to define reasonable doubt should be left to the court's discretion." Id. at 610-11 (footnote omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.