What is the test for deferential abuse of discretion in a medical malpractice case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Caradine, A121968 (Cal. App. 2012):
We review a trial court's ruling pursuant to Evidence Code section 352 under the deferential abuse of discretion standard. (People v. Kipp (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1100, 1121.) We also review a trial court's determination whether a purported expert is qualified to
Page 30
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for abuse of discretion in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for "abuse of discretion" in cases involving abuse of discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does section 2337 of the Medical Association's Medical Licence Review Guidelines apply to a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does a request to continue trial for abuse of discretion in a medical malpractice case succeed? (California, United States of America)
What is the case law on abuse of expert testimony in medical malpractice cases? (California, United States of America)
Does Defendant have a claim that the trial court abused its discretion to treat Defendant as a "defendant" in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
In a motion to suppress evidence in a medical malpractice case, has a recommending physician ever been allowed to attach a statement recommending marijuana for medical purposes? (California, United States of America)
Does a restitution order for abuse of discretion constitute an abuse of the court's discretion? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for abuse of discretion in determining whether a judge abused discretion in finding that a plaintiff's photographs were prejudicial? (California, United States of America)
