What is the test for credibility of a witness in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Meyer, B269169 (Cal. App. 2017):

examination]; see also Evid. Code, 780 ["jury may consider in determining the credibility of a witness any matter that has any tendency in reason to prove or disprove . . . [] . . . [] (i) The existence of nonexistence of any fact testified to by him"]; People v. Gallagher (1893) 100 Cal. 466, 476 ["It was not the intention of the legislature to give to a defendant the opportunity of making any statement upon his direct examination which he might choose, in reference to the issue before the court, and to preclude the prosecution from showing out of his own mouth that such statement is false"].)

Other Questions


Is the court abused its discretion in refusing to protect a witness in a sexual assault case from the possibility that the prosecution witnesses in the case colluded to corroborate their testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What are the factors used by a court to determine the credibility of a witness in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Does the credibility of the witness in a sexual assault case have to be affected by the prior criminal act of the accused? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining the credibility of a witness in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
Does a promise of leniency from a detective at trial and on appeal in a sexual assault case affect the credibility of a witness at trial? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for credibility of a witness in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.