California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Munoz, 157 Cal.App.3d 999, 204 Cal.Rptr. 271 (Cal. App. 1984):
"To corroborate the testimony of an accomplice, the prosecution must present independent evidence which, without aid or direction from the testimony of the accomplice, tends reasonably to connect the defendant with the commission of the crime charged. [Citation.] Corroborating evidence is insufficient if it does no more than cast a 'grave suspicion' upon the accused, or merely connects him with the crime's perpetrators. [Citation.] While the corroborating evidence need not support every fact to which the accomplice has testified, it must tend to implicate the defendant and therefore must relate to some act or fact which is an element of the crime. [Citations.]" (People v. Mardian (1975) 47 Cal.App.3d 16, 42, 121 Cal.Rptr. 269; italics added.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.