What is the test for compartmentalizing hearsay in a jury trial?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Legaspi, F065549 (Cal. App. 2020):

"[W]hile we do presume the jury has endeavored to follow the court's instructions [citation], we cannot always assume that those instructions are sufficient to dispel the taint of prejudicial information. A limiting instruction warning jurors they should not think about the elephant in the room is not the same thing as having no elephant in the room." (People v. Fritz (2007) 153 Cal.App.4th 949, 962.) Assuming the jury succeeded in compartmentalizing the hearsay and refrained from concluding defendant was predisposed to criminal behavior, it would have been difficult to ignore the inference of modus operandi.4

Other Questions


When a defendant makes a mid-trial motion to revoke his self represented status and have standby counsel appointed for the remainder of the trial, does the trial court have a duty to manage the trial? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that appellant was found incompetent after the trial not establish that he was incompetent during the trial, but does not establish he was competent at the time of trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a deputy district attorney acquiesce in having the motion heard during the trial of a defendant before trial, rather than prior to trial? (California, United States of America)
Can a trial judge that commences a jury trial be prevented from proceeding until the trial is over? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion for a new trial on nonstatutory grounds such as denial of a fair trial after being denied a trial by a jury? (California, United States of America)
Is a defendant's claim that the trial court's failure to provide him with the means and subpoena witnesses to defend at trial a violation of his Sixth Amendment right to represent himself at trial reversible? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a trial judge to proceed with the trial of a defendant under section 1368 of the California Mental Health Act if the trial judge receives the reports of two psychiatrists? (California, United States of America)
What are the principles of a motion for a new trial where a witness in a murder trial later dies before the trial has even begun? (California, United States of America)
Does a motion for a new trial need to be denied because the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion for new trial? (California, United States of America)
Does a waiver of a jury trial apply to a defendant before proceeding to a bench trial? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.