What is the test for certifying an evidentiary ruling that is manifestly erroneous?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from United States v. Cavigliano, 15-200-cr (2nd Cir. 2016):
erroneous. United States v. Miller, 626 F.3d 682, 688 (2d Cir. 2010). "[E]ven where we conclude that an evidentiary ruling was manifestly erroneous, we will nonetheless affirm if the error was harmless." Id. (internal quotation marks omitted).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the evidentiary ruling of the district court for abuse of evidentiary rulings? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there a clear abuse of evidentiary power in the federal district court's evidentiary rulings? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a Minister of Justice have to comply with Rule 18 of the Rules of Procedure, or is it a breach of procedural fairness if the Minister of Citizenship and Immigration refuses to forgoing Rule 18? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
What are the evidentiary rulings for abuse of evidentiary in a deportation case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the cost of an assessment of costs under Rule 140(3) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
How have courts interpreted Rule 29 in the context of Rule 29? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does the rule of Enmund, or is it a "watershed rule of criminal procedure" comparable to Gideon v. Wainwright or Saffle v. Saffle? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a statement of claim be struck out under Rule 419(1)(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does a violation of Rule 41 require an evidentiary hearing? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a rule similar to section 172 of the Rules of Civil Procedure? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
