What is the test for calling a witness an "accomplice"?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Hendrix, C085525 (Cal. App. 2019):

"If there is evidence that a witness against the defendant is an accomplice, the trial court must give jury instructions defining 'accomplice.' [Citation.] It also must instruct that an accomplice's incriminating testimony must be viewed with caution [citation] and must be corroborated [citation]." (People v. Felton (2004) 122 Cal.App.4th 260, 267-268.)

Other Questions


When an accomplice is called as a witness by the prosecution, is the jury required to distrust the testimony of their accomplice's testimony? (California, United States of America)
Is a judge obligated to call a witness whom he could be expected to call if that witness testimony would be favorable? (California, United States of America)
When can a witness be called an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
Does a witness who disowns his out-of-court identification have an opportunity to question the witness on the witness stand? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for calling a witness an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
Is a witness who is called as an accomplice by the prosecution entitled to cross-examination? (California, United States of America)
Can a witness be admitted as a witness at a preliminary hearing where the witness is in a state hospital? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant cross-examine the testimony of a witness who has never been called as a witness? (California, United States of America)
Does a prosecutor have the power to ask a witness if they have evidence that the witness is not a witness? (California, United States of America)
Can a witness be called as a witness even though there is no action pending? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.