What is the test for appellate review of a judgment or order of the trial court?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Schmidt v. Serv. Corp. Int'l, B242154 (Cal. App. 2013):
The basic rule of appellate review is that the judgment or order of the trial court is presumed to be correct and error must be affirmatively shown. (Denham v. Superior Court (1970) 2 Cal.3d 557, 564.)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a fee order under review is ordered by a judge other than the trial judge, does the court have any discretion or authority to review the order? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to review an order from the Superior Court of Appeal against a motion of appeal against an order requiring the Court to review the order? (California, United States of America)
How does the clerk of the court remit to the trial court a copy of the judgment or order of the reviewing court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for requesting that further proceedings be heard before a trial judge other than the judge whose judgment or order was reviewed by the appellate court? (California, United States of America)
Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to order an order affecting a judgment from the trial court while the appeal is pending? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, does the appellate court have power to substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a review court to order a review of a judgment made by the Superior Court of Appeal? (California, United States of America)
What is the duty of an appellate court to uphold a judgment or order of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When a factual determination is challenged by an appellate court on the grounds that there is no substantial evidence to sustain it, can the appellate court substitute its deductions for those of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
