What is the test for an order of restitution in a sexual assault case?

In sum, we conclude that the repair estimates submitted by the victim provided substantial evidence of economic loss. (See People v. Garcia (2010) 185 Cal.App.4th 1203, 1217 [billing summary of therapy charges showing the specific amount billed for each therapy session constituted substantial evidence of the amount of loss sustained by

Page 6

the victim].) Thus, the restitution order entered by the trial was not an abuse of discretion. (People v. Keichler (2005) 129 Cal.App.4th 1039, 1045 [no abuse of discretion where there is a "factual and rational basis for the amount of restitution ordered by the trial court"].)²

The juvenile court's order of restitution is affirmed.

Jenkins, J.

We concur:

McGuiness, P. J.

Siggins, J.

Notes:

^1. Further references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified.