California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Gray v. Gelsebach, B288574 (Cal. App. 2019):
alleged violator on behalf of him or herself. No California case has decided this issue. Consequently, this case requires interpretation of the statute. "When interpreting a statute, 'our primary goal is to determine and give effect to the underlying purpose of the law. [Citation.]' [Citation.] If the meaning of a statute is unmistakable, that meaning must be accepted. But if a statute is unclear or ambiguous, we may interpret its language in light of the statutory scheme, objects to be achieved, evils to be remedied, legislative history, public policy, and contemporaneous administrative construction. [Citation.] In addition, we may consider the consequences that will flow from a particular interpretation. [Citation.]" (Moreno v. Quemuel (2013) 219 Cal.App.4th 914, 918.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.