The following excerpt is from U.S. v. Sherpa, 99 F.3d 1148 (9th Cir. 1996):
"We review the district court's denial of an in limine motion for an abuse of discretion." United States v. Wallace, 848 F.2d 1464, 1472 (9th Cir.1988). See also United States v. Ravel, 930 F.2d 721, 726 (9th Cir.) (a district court's order precluding certain testimony is an evidentiary ruling subject to review for abuse of discretion), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 911 (1991).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.