What is the test for an ex post facto violation of a sentence in a sexual assault case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Palomar, F067273 (Cal. App. 2015):

"[I]t is the prosecution's responsibility to prove to the jury that the charged offenses occurred on or after the effective date of the statute providing for the defendant's punishment. When the evidence at trial does not establish that fact, the defendant is entitled to be sentenced under the formerly applicable statutes even if he raised no objection in the trial court." (People v. Hiscox (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 253, 256.)

An ex post facto violation resulting in an unauthorized sentence may be raised on appeal even if the defendant failed to object below and may be corrected at any time. (People v. Dotson (1997) 16 Cal.4th 547, 554, fn. 6.)

Other Questions


What is the effect of an ex post facto violation of the formerly applicable sentencing provisions in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the relevant case law regarding allegations of sexual assault made against appellant in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
When a photograph of a defendant in a sexual assault case was found to have been taken in the context of an alleged sexual assault, is there any connection to the subsequent verdict of attempted sodomy? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissibility of evidence of prior sexual assault in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
When testifying in a sexual assault case, does the use of the word "sex" by the victims constitute sufficient evidence for the purposes of sexual arousal or sexual gratification? (California, United States of America)
Is there any reason to exclude evidence of sexual assault prior to the trial of defendant in his sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting prior sexual assault evidence in a sexual assault case? (California, United States of America)
In a sexual assault case, is it possible for a defendant to sexually assault two women by touching their genitals? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.