California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Parsi v. Rosemary Court Props. LLC, A146403 (Cal. App. 2017):
We recently had occasion to address the issue in a case quite similar to this, in the case quoted in defendants' moving papers below: Moriarty, supra, 224 Cal.App.4th at pp. 133-134. We began our analysis as follows: "In order for a complaint to be within the anti-SLAPP statute, the 'critical consideration is whether the cause of action is based on the defendant's protected free speech or petitioning activity.' (Navellier v. Sletten
Page 4
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.