California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Barrington v. A.H. Robins Co., 154 Cal.App.3d 938, 201 Cal.Rptr. 705 (Cal. App. 1984):
Generally, an amended complaint will "relate back" to the filing of the original complaint if two elements exist. They are: (1) the amended complaint rests upon the same general set of facts as the original complaint; and (2) it refers to the same accident and same injuries referred to in the original complaint. Smeltzley v. Nicholson Mfg. Co. (1977) 18 Cal.3d 932, 936-937, 136 Cal.Rptr. 269, 559 P.2d 624.)
In essence, in order to "relate back", the amendment must allege the same operative facts and must substitute the name of the new defendant for a previously named Doe defendant. (Lesko v. Superior Court (1982) 127 Cal.App.3d 476, 482, 179 Cal.Rptr. 595.) If these elements are not met, the amending pleading does not "relate back."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.