The following excerpt is from High Fidelity Recordings, Inc. v. Audio Fidelity, Inc., 305 F.2d 86 (9th Cir. 1962):
5 This court, in National Van Lines v. Dean, supra, also said, giving foundation in law for the district court's Finding No. 11 which appellant here contends was erroneous, that:
"It is not essential to show intent to deceive in order to establish a case of unfair competition. But, if such an intent is shown, it raises a presumption that deception and confusion resulted. * * *" (237 F.2d at 692.)
What could be more intentional than that which is deliberate?
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.