What is the test for admitting "testimonial" evidence in a criminal case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Cabrera, H044409 (Cal. App. 2019):
"The Sixth Amendment's Confrontation Clause provides that, '[i]n all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right . . . to be confronted with the witnesses against him.' " (Crawford v. Washington (2004) 541 U.S. 36, 42.) In Crawford, the United States Supreme Court held that the admission of " 'testimonial' " hearsay violates
Page 13
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal conduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal intent in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
In determining whether to admit expert testimony in a medical malpractice case, what is the test for admitting expert testimony? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible evidence in a criminal case where an expert testified that there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal propensity in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
In a criminal case, is there any case law in which a jury has been ordered to conduct cross-examination of evidence in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
