What is the test for admitting or denying evidence in a criminal case?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Steward, B258993 (Cal. App. 2016):

prove or disprove the material fact (i.e., probative value); and (3) the existence of any rule or policy requiring the exclusion of relevant evidence (i.e., prejudicial effect or other [Evid. Code,] 352 concern). [Citations.] [] Courts subject other crimes evidence to '"extremely careful analysis"' [citation] and review the admission of such evidence for abuse of discretion [citation]." (People v. Hendrix (2013) 214 Cal.App.4th 216, 238.)

Other Questions


What is the test for admitting or denying evidence of uncharged misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal intent in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admissible evidence in a criminal case where an expert testified that there was no evidence of criminal wrongdoing? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal propensity in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal conduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of criminal misconduct in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting evidence of sexual assault in a criminal case? (California, United States of America)
For the purposes of section 1108.2(1) of the California Criminal Code, is there any constitutional error in a trial court's decision to instruct the jury in a sexual assault case to consider the use of sexual assault evidence admitted under Section 1108? (California, United States of America)
In a criminal case, is there any case law in which a jury has been ordered to conduct cross-examination of evidence in the penalty phase? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.