California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Farley, D062857 (Cal. App. 2014):
"[T]he Constitution permits judges 'to exclude evidence that is "repetitive . . . , only marginally relevant," or poses an undue risk of "harassment, prejudice, [or] confusion of the issues." ' " (Holmes v. South Carolina (2006) 547 U.S. 319, 320 [stating that evidentiary rules that preclude the admission of third-party culpability evidence that does not sufficiently connect the third person to the crime are "widely accepted"].)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.