What is the test for admitting an audio recording at trial?

"New York", United States of America

The following excerpt is from People v. Nunez, 115 N.Y.S.3d 597 (Table), 63 Misc.3d 150 (A) (N.Y. App. Term 2019):

In order for an audio recording to be admitted into evidence at trial, the People must lay a foundation establishing "proof of the accuracy or authenticity of the tape by clear and convincing evidence establishing that the offered evidence is genuine and that there has been no tampering with it" ( People v. Ely , 68 NY2d 520, 527 [1986] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted] ). Such proof can be established by the testimony of a participant in the conversation that the recording is a complete and accurate reproduction of the conversation which has not been altered, by the testimony of a witness to the conversation to the same effect, by the testimony of a participant in the conversation together with proof by an expert that the recording has not been altered, or by testimony establishing the chain of custody of the recording ( id. , 68 NY2d at 527-528 ).

Here, none of the participants in the complainant's 911 call or the 911 call that had allegedly been made by defendant testified at trial. The People did not offer any evidence that the recordings are "genuine and that there has been no tampering with [them]" ( id. at 527 ), and they did not offer any expert evidence that the recordings had not otherwise been altered (see id. ). Consequently, the only remaining means for the People to prove the accuracy or authenticity of the recordings was by introducing chain of custody evidence, which the People failed to do. Such proof "requires, in addition to evidence concerning the making of the tapes and identification of the speakers, that within reasonable limits those who have handled the tape from its making to its production in court identify it and testify to its custody and unchanged condition" ( id. at 528 [internal quotation marks omitted]; cf. People v. Patterson , 93 NY2d 80, 84 [1999] [chain of custody may be shown to prove the authenticity of a videotape or photograph "and even allow for acceptable inferences of reasonable accuracy and freedom from tampering"] ).

Other Questions


Does the trial judge erred in denying a post-trial motion for a new trial based upon alleged violations of sequestration order by members of the jury or marshals assigned to supervise the jury? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a nurse’s notes and hospital records be admitted as prima facie proof of the truth of their contents under the hearsay exception for medical records? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Is a motion for a continuance granted by the trial court on the date of trial on the basis that the trial judge abused his discretion to grant the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for admitting statements that may not be admitted in a criminal trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a broadcaster argue that pre-recording a performance of a performance necessarily include making an ephemeral recording of the performance? (Canada (Federal), Canada)
Does the voir dire, opening statements and jury poll need to be recorded at trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the relevance of a trial court's decision to admit or exclude evidence in an abuse case? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a defendant admit evidence of a prior criminal record to prove his motive? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has argued that the delay in completing his trial prejudiced his trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When will a trial judge override a motion to dismiss a motion that would have allowed evidence of sexual assault to be used in the trial? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.