The following excerpt is from Dalessandro v. Cnty. of Nassau, 18-543 (2nd Cir. 2019):
1. "A denial of a Rule 59 motion for a new trial is reviewed for abuse of discretion, which occurs when (1) the decision rests on an error of law . . . or a clearly erroneous factual finding, or (2) the decision--though not necessarily the product of a legal error or a clearly erroneous factual finding--cannot be located within the range of permissible decisions." Harris v. O'Hare, 770 F.3d 224, 231 (2d Cir. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.