California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Claudio, F070375 (Cal. App. 2015):
2. For the first time on appeal, defendant asserts that, even if his initial detention was reasonable, his prolonged detention "based upon his refusal to permit a pat down search" was unreasonable. He provides no further argument or citation to authority, so we will not address this issue. (People v. Hardy (1992) 2 Cal.4th 86, 150.) Defendant also did not elicit any evidence in the trial court of the duration of the detention. "[F]or a suppression ruling to be reviewable, the underlying objection, contention or theory must have been urged and determined in the trial court." (People v. Manning (1973) 33 Cal.App.3d 586, 600.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.