What is the test for a reasonable defense of habitation?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Silvey, 58 Cal.App.4th 1320, 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 681 (Cal. App. 1997):

California law declares to be justifiable, homicide committed in reasonable defense of habitation (Pen.Code, 197; People v. Gleghorn (1987) 193 Cal.App.3d 196, 200, 238 Cal.Rptr. 82), but it extends the presumption of "a reasonable fear of imminent peril of death or great bodily injury" only to residents (Pen.Code, 198.5). This makes sense. It is a judgment rooted in our veneration of home and our recognition that the resident is in the best position to assess an ostensible threat to the home, consider any extenuating circumstances, and determine what response is necessary.

Other Questions


Is a mistake-of-fact defense defense defense harmless? (California, United States of America)
What is the legal test for a defense counsel to pursue an innocence defense rather than a voluntary intoxication defense? (California, United States of America)
Does the absence of lingering doubt from a recitation of evidence the defense offered in an attempt to raise reasonable doubt raise a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does a defense based on a reasonable but mistaken belief in the victim's capacity to give legal consent have to have been objectively reasonable? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of not telling the jury that a defendant must use reasonable means and reasonable force to sustain a claim of self-defense? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a reasonable probability of a more favourable result under the reasonable beyond reasonable doubt standard? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for evidence that the appellant could reasonably reasonably reasonably expect the appellant to have knowledge of a crime? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between a reasonable and unreasonable plaintiff and a reasonable plaintiff under a "reasonable implied assumption of risk" approach? (California, United States of America)
Does the defense meet the reasonable diligence and reasonable diligence requirements of a jury in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Is there a reasonable probability that the defense would have disclosed impeached impeached or impeached evidence to the defense? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.