The following excerpt is from Reed v. Paramo, Case No.: 18-CV-361 JLS (LL) (S.D. Cal. 2019):
"To state a conspiracy claim under 1983, a plaintiff must 'show (1) an agreement between the defendants to deprive the plaintiff of a constitutional right, (2) an overt act in furtherance of the conspiracy, and (3) a constitutional violation.'" Beattie v. Armenta, No. 14cv02310 WQH (RBB), 2015 WL 10319088, at *9 (S.D. Cal. July 27, 2015). For liability, each participant "must at least share the common objective of the conspiracy,"
Page 14
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.