The following excerpt is from Colvin v. O'Connor, 129 F.3d 125 (9th Cir. 1997):
We review a denial of a recusal motion for abuse of discretion. See Sewer Alert Comm. v. Pierce County, 791 F.2d 796, 798 (9th Cir.1986) (per curiam). "The standard for recusal is 'whether a reasonable person with knowledge of all the facts would conclude that the judge's impartiality might reasonably be questioned.' " See id. (quoting United States v. Nelson, 718 F.2d 315, 321 (9th Cir.1983)).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.