The following excerpt is from United States v. Kuburovich, 19-10215 (9th Cir. 2021):
1. Defendant first argues that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(c)(1). We review for clear error the district court's findings of fact, including a finding that the ends of justice warrant a continuance, United States v. Henry, 984 F.3d 1343, 1349-50 (9th Cir. 2021), and we otherwise review de novo the denial of the motion, id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.