What is the test for a motion to amend or amend a Complaint to include a claim under Section 1983 of the Federal Trade Commission Act?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Solomon v. Tate, 1:12-cv-00056-GSA-PC (E.D. Cal. 2014):
Plaintiff has now filed two complaints without alleging facts against any defendant which state a claim under 1983. The court finds that the deficiencies outlined above are not capable of being cured by amendment, and therefore further leave to amend should not be granted. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii); Lopez v. Smith. 203 F.3d 1122, 1127 (9th Cir. 2000).
Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Is a plaintiff permitted to amend or amend his complaint to include new, unrelated claims in his second amended complaint? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a motion to amend an amended complaint sufficient to include all of the claims alleged in the original complaint? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a motion to amend a Motion to amend the Petitioner's Statement of Claim to add new claims timely? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to amend a section of the Federal Trade Commission Act? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a plaintiff permitted to amend or amend his complaint to include new, unrelated claims in the original complaint? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a plaintiff fails to state a claim under section 1986 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, can he continue to sue the federal government for damages? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a plaintiff have to amend his complaint to include new unrelated claims in his amended complaint? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to amend a motion where the motion is seeking leave to amend the motion? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
