The following excerpt is from Ryan v. City of Lincoln, Corp., No. 2:18-cv-00096-KJM-DB (E.D. Cal. 2018):
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1), a defending party may move for dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. "A Rule 12(b)(1) jurisdictional attack may be facial or factual." Safe Air for Everyone v. Meyer, 373 F.3d 1035, 1039 (9th Cir. 2004). A facial attack claims the "allegations contained in [the] complaint are insufficient on their face to invoke federal jurisdiction," whereas a factual attack "disputes the truth of the allegations that, by themselves, would otherwise invoke federal jurisdiction." Id. If there is ambiguity as to whether the attack is facial or factual, the court applies a facial analysis. See Wichansky v. Zoel Holding
Page 3
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.