What is the test for a motion for disclosure of information in the personnel files of a police officer?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Starrett, F077104 (Cal. App. 2021):

Under Pitchess, a defendant may bring a motion for disclosure of certain relevant information in the personnel files of police officers by showing good cause for discovery and how it would support a defense to the charge against him. (Warrick v. Superior Court (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1011, 10181019; 832.7, 832.8; Evid. Code, 10431045.)

When the court finds good cause and conducts an in camera review pursuant to Pitchess, the court must hold an in camera hearing, during which the custodian of records brings all documents potentially relevant' to the defendant's motion. (People v. Mooc (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1216, 1226.) Subject to statutory exceptions and limitations..., the trial court should then disclose to the defendant such information [that] is relevant to the subject matter involved in the pending litigation.' (Ibid.)

The court must make a record that will permit future appellate review. (People v. Mooc, supra, 26 Cal.4th at pp. 12291230.) The court may preserve the record by either copying the documents and placing them in a confidential file, preparing a sealed list of the documents it reviewed, or simply stat[ing] for the record what documents it examined and sealing the transcript. (Id. at p. 1229.)

A trial court's decision on the discoverability of material in police personnel files is reviewable under an abuse of discretion standard. (People v. Jackson (1996) 13 Cal.4th 1164, 1220.)

Other Questions


When a defendant files a Pitchess motion for in camera review of a police officer's personnel file, what are the requirements for such review? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for making a reasonable grounds for arrest within a police department by one officer transmitting information purportedly received from an informer to another officer who had not received such information? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances have we rejected a motion for disclosure of complaints in a police officer's personnel file relating to fabrication of evidence? (California, United States of America)
How has the court treated a motion for disclosure of personnel records of two police officers? (California, United States of America)
How has the court interpreted Pitchess on a motion to compel disclosure of a law enforcement officer's personnel file? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion for discovery be made in the personnel files of a police officer? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to discover a police officer's personnel file? (California, United States of America)
Can a criminal defendant compel discovery of information in the personnel files of a police officer? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant who claims self-defense to a charge of battery upon a police officer, who is also charged with battery upon the officer, obtain materials from the police department concerning the propensity for violence against the officer? (California, United States of America)
What is the consequence of the failure to disclose relevant information in a police officer's personnel file? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.