California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Motta, D061951 (Cal. App. 2013):
In ruling on a motion for new trial based on newly discovered evidence, the trial court considers whether: (1) the evidence, and not merely its materiality, is newly discovered; (2) the evidence be not cumulative merely; (3) the evidence is such as to render a different result probable on a retrial of the cause; (4) the party could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced it at the trial; and (5) these facts are shown by the best evidence of which the case admits. (People v. Delgado (1993) 5 Cal.4th 312, 328.) Ultimately, a motion for new trial is a matter for the trial court's discretion. Once the court has denied the motion, its exercise of discretion will not be
Page 19
overturned on appeal absent a manifest abuse of discretion. On appeal, we assess this question based on the facts and circumstances of the underlying case. (People v. Delgado, supra, 5 Cal.4th at p. 328.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.