What is the test for a jury to find that the respondent was wrongfully discharged and routinely reassigned?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Rulon-Miller v. International Business MacHines Corp., 162 Cal.App.3d 241, 208 Cal.Rptr. 524 (Cal. App. 1984):
The test for the court here is substantial evidence (see Neal v. Farmers Ins. Exchange (1978) 21 Cal.3d 910, 922, 148 Cal.Rptr. 389, 582 P.2d 980) and without any question there was substantial evidence to support the jury verdict that the respondent was wrongfully discharged rather than routinely reassigned.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a respondent has not filed a respondents' brief in an appeal, can the court order that the respondent must file his or her own brief? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a motion to recover costs from Respondent Respondent to Respondent in a personal injury case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a wrongful discharge claim? (California, United States of America)
Can a plaintiff recover damages from Respondent Respondent's failure to comply with section 27 'Change of Occupancy' section? (California, United States of America)
In a wrongful attachment action for damages for economic loss sustained as a result of wrongful attachment, what are the costs incurred in defending the underlying action? (California, United States of America)
Does the California Motor Vehicle Regulatory Commission have jurisdiction to enforce a unionized employee's wrongful discharge rights? (California, United States of America)
Does the late filing of a complaint in an intervention action require the respondent to respond to the complaint within the time set out in the summons? (California, United States of America)
What causes of action can a plaintiff bring in a common law cause of action for emotional distress and wrongful discharge? (California, United States of America)
Does counsel who fail to respond when given the chance to respond to arguments in an adversarial context deprive the trial court of the opportunity to consider their arguments in a similar context? (California, United States of America)
Can Respondents to a claim for future economic loss in a personal injury or wrongful death case seek damages for "future economic loss"? (California, United States of America)
