California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. O'Connor, 10 Cal.Rptr.2d 530, 8 Cal.App.4th 941 (Cal. App. 1992):
The "limited judicial exception to this rule which is applicable in conspiracy cases" (People v. Pahl (1991) 226 Cal.App.3d 1651, 1657, 277 Cal.Rptr. 656), does not here apply.
Appellant's final argument is a reweighing of the evidence: he finds reasonable doubt. As an appellate court we may not reweigh the evidence. If "on the entire record, a rational trier of fact could find appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt" (People v. Barnes, supra, 42 Cal.3d 284, 303, 228 Cal.Rptr. 228, 721 P.2d 110) we must affirm that finding. We have carefully read the entire record, examined all the exhibits, and are satisfied that substantial evidence supports each of the 14 guilty counts.
3. Appellant contends the court erred in admitting his sexually explicit sketches.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.