What is the test for a jury finding no liability on strict liability failure to warn?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from Tibbett v. L.A. Cnty. Fire Dep't, B282759 (Cal. App. 2019):

defect]; accord, Oxford v. Foster Wheeler LLC (2009) 177 Cal.App.4th 700, 720 [jury's finding of negligent failure to warn was "logically and legally inconsistent" with jury's finding of no liability on strict liability failure to warn].)

Other Questions


Can a plaintiff bring an action against a manufacturer based upon strict liability or breach of warranty liability? (California, United States of America)
What is the current state of the law on liability for failure to warn? (California, United States of America)
Can a jury find prejudice from a failure to give an aiding and abetting instruction when a defendant has been found guilty under instructions based on direct perpetrator liability? (California, United States of America)
Does a failure to warn of a gas leak create liability for injury? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for a failure to warn theory in a product liability case? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for finding a manufacturer liable in strict liability in a medical malpractice case? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding of absolute liability in a motor vehicle accident constitute absolute liability? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for determining whether a product is defective for strict liability purposes? (California, United States of America)
Is the law requiring a jury to produce written findings when the jury is not able to produce the written findings? (California, United States of America)
How have courts treated a failure to specify that intoxication could be a defense to derivative but not direct liability for assault? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.