What is the test for a judicial review of a decision to certify an EIR and approve a project?

Judicial review of an agency's decision to certify an EIR and approve a project shall extend only to whether there was a prejudicial abuse of discretion. Abuse of discretion is established if the agency has not proceeded in a manner required by law or if the determination or decision is not supported by substantial evidence. [Citations.] Thus, we consider only whether the City failed to comply with CEQA or made determinations that were not supported by substantial evidence. ( Preservation Action Council v. City of San Jose (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 1336, 1352, 46 Cal.Rptr.3d 902,( PAC ); Pub. Resources Code, 21168.)