The following excerpt is from Beer Garden, Inc. v. New York State Liquor Authority, 582 N.Y.S.2d 65, 590 N.E.2d 1193, 79 N.Y.2d 266 (N.Y. 1992):
" 'Next in importance to the duty of rendering a righteous judgment, is that of doing it in such a manner as will beget no suspicion of the fairness and integrity of the judge.' So vital is deemed the observance of this principle that it has been held that a judge disqualified under a statute cannot act even with the consent of the parties interested, because the law was not designed merely for the protection of the parties to the suit, [79 N.Y.2d 279] but for the general interests of justice." (Matter of City of Rochester, supra, 208 N.Y. at 192, 101 N.E. 875, quoting People ex rel. Roe & Roe v. Suffolk Common Pleas, 18 Wend 550, 552; see also, Matter of Pelaez v. Waterfront
Page 71
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.