What is the test for a finding that methamphetamine was transported for sale rather than for personal use?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Campbell, B231575 (Cal. App. 2012):
4. Appellant does not challenge the propriety of the trial court, rather than the jury, making the finding that the methamphetamine was transported for sale, rather than for personal use.
5. People v. Watson (1956) 46 Cal.2d 818.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a person transport for sale a controlled substance that is within the exclusive possession of another person? (California, United States of America)
Does Section 12022.7 of the California Criminal Code apply to a person who personally inflicts great bodily injury on another person other than an accomplice? (California, United States of America)
In what circumstances will the Attorney General argue that section 190.2(b) of the California Criminal Code does not require that the actual killer be a person who personally kills but rather one who proximately causes the death? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that a house was inhabited at the time of the burglary incorporate into the finding that another person was present? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant be found guilty of possessing methamphetamine and transporting methamphetamine? (California, United States of America)
What is the difference between finding that a principal in the commission of a felony and finding that one or more principals in the crime was personally armed with a firearm? (California, United States of America)
What is the "reasonable person" standard in determining whether a person is a reasonable person? (California, United States of America)
Does a finding that the circumstances might also reasonably reasonably be reconciled with a contrary finding in a personal injury case have to be reversed? (California, United States of America)
Does the fact that Weizoerick and Ahlo opined the drugs were possessed for sale rather than personal use, rather than possession, are sufficient evidence to convict a defendant of a drug offence? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for establishing that a finding or finding in a personal injury case will not be set aside on appeal? (California, United States of America)
