What is the test for a finding that a Defendant consented to the search of the Case?
California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Lewis, B237686 (Cal. App. 2013):
ground in Liodas v. Sahadi (1977) 19 Cal.3d 278, 287, fn. 3.)" (People v. Jackson (1992) 10 Cal.App.4th 13, 20-21.)
IV. The Finding That Defendant Consented to the Search of the Case Is Supported by Substantial Evidence
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a search warrant be used to search for marijuana and heroin in the bedroom of a defendant who had not consented to a search after his arrest? (California, United States of America)
Can a search warrant be used to search defendant's home after he consented to the search? (California, United States of America)
What is the effect of the Court of Appeal's recent finding that a defendant who has pleaded guilty to a charge of perverting the course of justice in a sexual assault case has been found guilty of a similar charge in a similar case? (California, United States of America)
Is a search of a toolbox search reasonable because the father's consent qualified under the third party-consent exception to warrant requirements? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law or case law that would have changed the disposition of a defendant in a civil case? (California, United States of America)
Can a search warrant be used to search a defendant's home without the consent of the probation officer? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for an implied finding that a defendant consented to a search? (California, United States of America)
What evidence supports the finding that a defendant consented to a search of his car by police officers? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
Is there any case law where a defendant has been found to have improperly used a judge's comments in a federal civil case to justify a finding of not guilty? (California, United States of America)
