The following excerpt is from Patterson v. Sherman, Case No. 1:18-cv-01688-DAD-JDP (E.D. Cal. 2020):
courts have "an active role in summarily disposing of facially defective habeas petitions." Ross v. Williams, 896 F.3d 958, 968 (9th Cir. 2018) (citation omitted). Rule 4 gives courts the "duty to screen out" petitions that are frivolous, vague, conclusory, "palpably incredible," "patently frivolous," or false. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.