California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from The People v. Casey, B214313, No. MA042406 (Cal. App. 2010):
Even if the defense has a contrary view of the facts, this does not demonstrate that the prosecutor's evidence is insufficient. (People v. Earp (1999) 20 Cal.4th 826, 887-888.) The jury was free to disbelieve the testimony of Youelle and defendant and to believe the testimony of the deputies and defendant's confession. There was a hypothesis under which the jury could have found the evidence consistent with guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Thus, substantial evidence supports defendant's conviction of possession of a firearm by a felon ( 12021, subd. (a)(1)) and possession of ammunition by a person prohibited from possessing firearms ( 12316, subd. (b)(1)). (People v. Zamudio, supra, 43 Cal.4th at p. 357.)
Page 8
B. Refusal to Allow Defendant to Present Evidence That He Had Been "Set Up"
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.