What is the test for a defendant to successfully appeal against a forfeiture condition in a personal injury case?

Here, defendant claims that even though she did not object to the challenged conditions at sentencing, her overbreadth and/or vagueness arguments present facial constitutional challenges with pure questions of law based on undisputed facts and, thus, can be properly raised on appeal for the first time. We agree with defendant and reject the People's forfeiture argument. However, we focus on the constitutionality of the condition, not whether it is reasonable as applied to defendant. (See People v. Lent

Page 15