The following excerpt is from United States v. DiMartino, 949 F.3d 67 (2nd Cir. 2020):
against her. Clark v. Perez, 510 F.3d 382, 386-88 (2d Cir. 2008). Despite "ample notice" that the defendant would mount a "disruptive, political defense" at trial, the trial court determined that she was competent to proceed to trial and represent herself pro sea determination that was never challenged. Id.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.