What is the test for a defendant to have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every essential element of the charge against him?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Mejia, B229268 (Cal. App. 2012):

failure, if any, of the People to prove beyond a reasonable doubt every essential element of the charge against him. No lack of testimony on defendant's part will make up for a failure of proof by the People so as to support a finding against him on any essential element." The jury is presumed to have followed these instructions, and counsel's declaration does not indicate otherwise. (Rufo v. Simpson (2001) 86 Cal.App.4th 573, 598-599.) The trial court properly found that defendant had not made the prima facie showing required to warrant a hearing under Code of Civil Procedure section 237.

Other Questions


How has the US Courts treated the burden of proving every element of the charged crimes beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
Does a defendant's tactical decision not to contest an essential element of an assault charge reduce the burden of proving every element? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for proving beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the charged offense? (California, United States of America)
Does the doctrine of reasonable doubt apply to a defendant's due process right to appeal against a jury verdict that diminished the prosecution's burden to prove beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
When will a prosecutor be found to have made a claim of misconduct when they argued "the burden of proving every element of the crimes charged beyond a reasonable doubt"? (California, United States of America)
Is it improper for a prosecutor to misstate the law generally and particularly the prosecution's burden of proving every element of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the prosecution's burden to prove every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the standard for determining whether a reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the prosecution's burden to prove every element of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
What is the test for proving the essential elements of a crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.