California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Saunders v. Jannusi, B292287 (Cal. App. 2020):
However, " '[I]t is not enough that the statement refer to a subject of widespread public interest; the statement must in some manner itself contribute to the public debate.' " (FilmOn, supra, 7 Cal.5th at p. 150, italics added.) "We are not concerned with the social utility of the speech at issue, or the degree to which it propelled the conversation in any particular direction; rather, we examine whether a defendant - through public or private speech or conduct - participated in, or furthered, the discourse that makes an issue one of public interest." (Id. at p. 151; Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc., supra, 7 Cal.5th at p. 900.) This question requires us to consider "context - including audience, speaker, and purpose." (FilmOn, at p. 152.)
Page 10
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.