California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Herrera-Ramos, B277401 (Cal. App. 2018):
always substantial evidence. (People v. Tufunga (1999) 21 Cal.4th 935, 944.) We review de novo the trial court's failure to instruct on a lesser-included offense. (People v. Cook (2006) 39 Cal.4th 566, 596.)
To convict a defendant of kidnapping, the prosecution must prove:
( 207, subd. (a); see CALCRIM No. 1215.) Attempted kidnapping ( 664/207) and false imprisonment ( 236) are both lesser-included offenses of kidnapping. (People v. Chacon (1995) 37 Cal.App.4th 52, 65.) False imprisonment differs from kidnapping in that false imprisonment does not require the victim's movement. (See CALCRIM No. 1240.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.