California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. Ross, B263980 (Cal. App. 2017):
Defendant does not contend that the trial court failed to consider the appropriate factors, but rather that the court failed to "properly balance relevant factors," and gave insufficient weight to mitigating factors. Thus, he must demonstrate that this is an extraordinary case where the appropriate factors "manifestly support the striking of a prior conviction and no reasonable minds could differ." (People v. Carmony, supra, 33 Cal.4th at p. 378.)
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.